Re: [PATCH v4] submodule: port subcommand 'set-branch' from shell to C

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24/05 12:19, Kaartic Sivaraam wrote:
> As '--quiet' in 'set-branch' is a no-op and is being accepted only for
> uniformity, I think it makes sense to use OPT_NOOP_NOARG instead of
> OPT__QUIET for specifying it, as suggested by Danh.
> 
> Also, the description "suppress output for setting default tracking branch"
> doesn't seem to be valid anymore as we don't print anything when set-branch
> succeeds.

I think it will all boil down to the consistency of all the subcommands.
Changing this would require making changes in various places: the C code
(obviously), the shell script (not only the cmd_set_branch() function
but the part for accepting user input as well) and the Documentation (I
might have maybe missed a couple of other changes to list here too). Its
not that I don't want to do this, but it would add unnecessary changes
don't you think? I would love it if others could weigh in their opinions
too about this.

 > +	git ${wt_prefix:+-C "$wt_prefix"} ${prefix:+--super-prefix "$prefix"} submodule--helper set-branch ${GIT_QUIET:+--quiet} ${branch:+--branch $branch} ${default:+--default} -- "$@"

> Danh questioned whether '$branch' needs to be quoted here. I too think it
> needs to be quoted unless I'm missing something.

We want to do this because $branch is an argument right?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux