Re: [PATCH v3] submodule: port subcommand 'set-branch' from shell to C

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
>
>>> +	config_set_in_gitmodules_file_gently(config_name, opt_branch);
>>
>> What happens if this fails? E.g. when the permission is denied or disk is
>> full? This C code would then still `return 0`, pretending that it
>> succeeded. But the original shell script calls `git submodule--helper
>> config [...]` which calls `module_config()`, which in turn passes through
>> the return value of the `config_set_in_gitmodules_file_gently()` call.
>>
>> In other words, you need something like this:
>>
>> 	int ret;
>>
>> 	[...]
>>
>> 	ret = config_set_in_gitmodules_file_gently(config_name, opt_branch);
>>
>> 	free(config_name);
>> 	return ret;
>
> Making sure we check the return value of helper functions we call is
> a good discipline,...

By the way, another topic by you for set-url has exactly the same
issue.  Its call to config_set_in_gitmodules_file_gently() can fail.

So can the call to sync_submodule(), but when it fails it won't come
back, so we do not have to worry about not capturing its return
value ;-)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux