Darren Tucker <dtucker@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > The caveat with putting it in GIT_CHECK_FUNC() is that you'll need to > include the union of all of the header files that might have all of > the things you're looking for instead of the hopefully small set of > them that might have the one specific thing you're looking for. I > suspect that would be more hassle than it's worth. Oh, what I had in mind was to replace GIT_CHECK_FUNC() with a macro that takes not just function name but also include file. Not "the union of all the include files".
