Re: [PATCH v13 02/13] t: use update-ref and show-ref to reading/writing refs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Han-Wen Nienhuys via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> From: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Reading and writing .git/refs/* assumes that refs are stored in the 'files'
> ref backend.
>
> Signed-off-by: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  t/t0002-gitfile.sh             |  2 +-
>  t/t1400-update-ref.sh          | 32 ++++++++++++++++----------------
>  t/t1506-rev-parse-diagnosis.sh |  2 +-
>  t/t6050-replace.sh             |  2 +-
>  t/t9020-remote-svn.sh          |  4 ++--
>  5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/t/t0002-gitfile.sh b/t/t0002-gitfile.sh
> index 0aa9908ea12..960ed150cb5 100755
> --- a/t/t0002-gitfile.sh
> +++ b/t/t0002-gitfile.sh
> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ test_expect_success 'check commit-tree' '
>  '
>  
>  test_expect_success 'check rev-list' '
> -	echo $SHA >"$REAL/HEAD" &&
> +	git update-ref "HEAD" "$SHA" &&
>  	test "$SHA" = "$(git rev-list HEAD)"
>  '
>  
> diff --git a/t/t1400-update-ref.sh b/t/t1400-update-ref.sh
> index e1197ac8189..27171f82612 100755
> --- a/t/t1400-update-ref.sh
> +++ b/t/t1400-update-ref.sh
> @@ -37,15 +37,15 @@ test_expect_success setup '
>  
>  test_expect_success "create $m" '
>  	git update-ref $m $A &&
> -	test $A = $(cat .git/$m)
> +	test $A = $(git show-ref -s --verify $m)

All of the above looks good.  These were written long time ago, and
we should have cleaned them up much earlier, but we didn't.

> diff --git a/t/t1506-rev-parse-diagnosis.sh b/t/t1506-rev-parse-diagnosis.sh
> index 52edcbdcc32..dbf690b9c1b 100755
> --- a/t/t1506-rev-parse-diagnosis.sh
> +++ b/t/t1506-rev-parse-diagnosis.sh
> @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ test_expect_success 'arg before dashdash must be a revision (ambiguous)' '
>  	{
>  		# we do not want to use rev-parse here, because
>  		# we are testing it
> -		cat .git/refs/heads/foobar &&
> +		git show-ref -s refs/heads/foobar &&
>  		printf "%s\n" --

Likewise.

>  	} >expect &&
>  	git rev-parse foobar -- >actual &&
> diff --git a/t/t6050-replace.sh b/t/t6050-replace.sh
> index e7e64e085dd..c80dc10b8f1 100755
> --- a/t/t6050-replace.sh
> +++ b/t/t6050-replace.sh
> @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ test_expect_success 'tag replaced commit' '
>  test_expect_success '"git fsck" works' '
>       git fsck master >fsck_master.out &&
>       test_i18ngrep "dangling commit $R" fsck_master.out &&
> -     test_i18ngrep "dangling tag $(cat .git/refs/tags/mytag)" fsck_master.out &&
> +     test_i18ngrep "dangling tag $(git show-ref -s refs/tags/mytag)" fsck_master.out &&

Likewise; this has no excuse of being old code ;-)

>       test -z "$(git fsck)"
>  '
>  
> diff --git a/t/t9020-remote-svn.sh b/t/t9020-remote-svn.sh
> index 6fca08e5e35..9fcfa969a9b 100755
> --- a/t/t9020-remote-svn.sh
> +++ b/t/t9020-remote-svn.sh
> @@ -48,8 +48,8 @@ test_expect_success REMOTE_SVN 'simple fetch' '
>  '
>  
>  test_debug '
> -	cat .git/refs/svn/svnsim/master
> -	cat .git/refs/remotes/svnsim/master
> +	git show-ref -s refs/svn/svnsim/master
> +	git show-ref -s refs/remotes/svnsim/master
>  '

Looks good.

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux