Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] remote-curl: fix deadlocks when remote server disconnects

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> Overall this looks pretty cleanly done. I left a few minor comments
> throughout, but the real question is whether we prefer the "0002" packet
> in the last one, or if we instead insist that the response end in a
> flush.

Thanks for a review.  I was reading the series through and I found
it a reasonably pleasant read.

> So I think either of your solutions (enforcing a final flush, or the
> 0002 packet) is preferable. I'm on the fence between them.

I am undecided, too X-<.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux