Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] transport: extract common fetch_pack() call

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>]

Denton Liu <liu.denton@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> In the switch statement, the difference between the `protocol_v2` and
> `protocol_v{1,0}` arms is a preparatory call to die_if_server_options() in
> the latter. The fetch_pack() call is identical in both arms. However,
> since this fetch_pack() call has so many parameters, it is not
> immediately obvious that the call is identical in both cases.

Sure.

	if (data->version < protocol_v2)
		die_if_server_options(transport);
	else if (data->version == protocol_unknown_version)
		BUG("...");

	refs = fetch_pack(...);

might have been even easier to follow, but that's OK.

>  	switch (data->version) {
>  	case protocol_v2:
> -		refs = fetch_pack(&args, data->fd,
> -				  refs_tmp ? refs_tmp : transport->remote_refs,
> -				  to_fetch, nr_heads, &data->shallow,
> -				  &transport->pack_lockfile, data->version);
> +		/* do nothing */
>  		break;
>  	case protocol_v1:
>  	case protocol_v0:
>  		die_if_server_options(transport);
> -		refs = fetch_pack(&args, data->fd,
> -				  refs_tmp ? refs_tmp : transport->remote_refs,
> -				  to_fetch, nr_heads, &data->shallow,
> -				  &transport->pack_lockfile, data->version);
>  		break;
>  	case protocol_unknown_version:
>  		BUG("unknown protocol version");
>  	}
> +	refs = fetch_pack(&args, data->fd,
> +			  refs_tmp ? refs_tmp : transport->remote_refs,
> +			  to_fetch, nr_heads, &data->shallow,
> +			  &transport->pack_lockfile, data->version);
>  
>  	close(data->fd[0]);
>  	close(data->fd[1]);