Re: [PATCH v2] ci: avoid pounding on the poor ci-artifacts container

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Junio,

On Fri, 15 May 2020, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx>
> writes:
>
> > From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx>
> >
> > When this developer tested how the git-sdk-64-minimal artifact could be
> > served to all the GitHub workflow runs that need it, Azure Blobs looked
> > like a pretty good choice: it is reliable, fast and we already use it in
> > Git for Windows to serve components like OpenSSL, cURL, etc
> >
> > It came as an unpleasant surprise just _how many_ times this artifact
> > was downloaded. It exploded the bandwidth to a point where the free tier
> > would no longer be enough, threatening to block other, essential Git for
> > Windows services.
> >
> > Let's switch back to using the Build Artifacts of our trusty Azure
> > Pipeline for the time being.
> >
> > To avoid unnecessary hammering of the Azure Pipeline artifacts, we use
> > the GitHub Action `actions/upload-artifact` in the `windows-build` job
> > and the GitHub Action `actions/download-artifact` in the `windows-test`
> > and `vs-test` jobs (the latter now depends on `windows-build` for that
> > reason, too).
> >
> > Helped-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> >     Change since v1:
> >
> >      * Simplifying the scripted code by using jq (thanks, Danh!)
>
> Thanks, both.  Will replace and let's merge it down before -rc1.

Thank you!
Dscho

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux