Re: [RFC PATCH v2] t4210: detect REG_ILLSEQ dynamically

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] t4210: detect REG_ILLSEQ dynamically
From: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <carenas@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 11:18:12 -0700
Cc: git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, emaste@xxxxxxxxxxx, sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <xmqqy2ptkrhp.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
References: <20200513111636.30818-1-carenas@gmail.com> <20200513180213.45866-1-carenas@gmail.com> <xmqqy2ptkrhp.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>

On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 11:00:50AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Is https://github.com/git/git/runs/678964255 related to this change?

yes; when built without PCRE then fixed can also trigger REG_SIGILL

Carlo

References:
- [PATCH] t4210: detect REG_ILLSEQ dynamically
  - From: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón
- [RFC PATCH v2] t4210: detect REG_ILLSEQ dynamically
  - From: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2] t4210: detect REG_ILLSEQ dynamically
  - From: Junio C Hamano

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 05/13] upload-pack: pass upload_pack_data to get_common_commits()
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 06/13] upload-pack: pass upload_pack_data to receive_needs()
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] t4210: detect REG_ILLSEQ dynamically
Next by thread: [PATCH v2] t4210: detect REG_ILLSEQ dynamically
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux