Re: [PATCH 2/2] submodule: Add 'quiet' option in subcommand 'set-branch'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Shourya,

I'm not really sure if we should have this patch at all since I don't
think that set-branch should be printing anything at all.

But I'll give some comments anyway. Hopefully they'll be enlightening.

On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 01:47:37AM +0530, Shourya Shukla wrote:
> The subcommand 'set-branch' had the 'quiet' option which was
> introduced in b57e8119e6 by Denton Liu but was never utilised due to

We typically refer to commits by the "reference" format. You can get
that as follows:

	$ git show --pretty=ref -s b57e8119e6
	b57e8119e6 (submodule: teach set-branch subcommand, 2019-02-08)

In addition, I don't think it's necessary to mention me by name in this
case.

> not setting of the 'GIT_QUIET' variable. Add functionality to
> utilise the 'quiet' function.
> 
> Mentored-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Mentored-by: Kaartic Sivaraam <kaartic.sivaraam@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Shourya Shukla <shouryashukla.oo@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> There was an existence of the `quiet` option in the shell version of
> 'set-branch' but it was not used anywhere. I decided to add a utility
> of the option here by setting GIT_QUIET to 1 in case of a `quiet` as
> well as ensure proper functioning in the C version regarding the same.
> The if-statement is inspired from what Junio suggested me in my previous
> conversion of 'set-url'.
> 
>  builtin/submodule--helper.c | 6 ++++--
>  git-submodule.sh            | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/builtin/submodule--helper.c b/builtin/submodule--helper.c
> index 5a8815b76e..36b69df5c4 100644
> --- a/builtin/submodule--helper.c
> +++ b/builtin/submodule--helper.c
> @@ -2321,7 +2321,8 @@ static int module_set_branch(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>  		config_name = xstrfmt("submodule.%s.branch", path);
>  		config_set_in_gitmodules_file_gently(config_name, newbranch);
>  
> -		printf(_("Default tracking branch set to '%s' successfully\n"), newbranch);
> +		if (!(quiet ? OPT_QUIET : 0))

This is needlessly complicated... Can't this just be written as

	if (!quiet)

> +			printf(_("Default tracking branch set to '%s' successfully\n"), newbranch);
>  		free(config_name);
>  	}
>  
> @@ -2334,7 +2335,8 @@ static int module_set_branch(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>  		config_name = xstrfmt("submodule.%s.branch", path);
>  		config_set_in_gitmodules_file_gently(config_name, NULL);
>  
> -		printf(_("Default tracking branch set to 'master' successfully\n"));
> +		if (!(quiet ? OPT_QUIET : 0))
> +			printf(_("Default tracking branch set to 'master' successfully\n"));
>  		free(config_name);
>  	}
>  
> diff --git a/git-submodule.sh b/git-submodule.sh
> index 2438ef576e..0cdc77ace6 100755
> --- a/git-submodule.sh
> +++ b/git-submodule.sh
> @@ -725,7 +725,7 @@ cmd_set_branch() {
>  	do
>  		case "$1" in
>  		-q|--quiet)
> -			# we don't do anything with this but we need to accept it
> +			GIT_QUIET=1
>  			;;
>  		-d|--default)
>  			default=1
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux