Re: [PATCH] t4210: detect REG_ILLSEQ dynamically

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <carenas@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> indeed, I would rather go away with the whole prereq and set a variable
> with a nice sounding name and use it below to `if test` the right tests,
> would that be ok?

In a sense, a prerequisite is an overkill if the tests that need to
be guarded are very well isolated and in a single place.  Do we
expect other tests outside the context of this script may have to be
guarded by REG_ILLSEQ?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux