Re: [PATCH v12 03/12] refs: document how ref_iterator_advance_fn should handle symrefs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 8:58 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Makes sense.
>
> I wonder if I should take 1-3/12 as a separate "clean-up" series and
> merge it before everything else down to 'master'?  That would reduce
> the churn somewhat.

That would be great. Do I need to send them separately, or do can you
cherry-pick the changes out of this series?


> I also wonder if there are similar "clean-up" buried later in the
> series. For example, would it make sense to also move 11/12 and have
> it graduate early together with 1-3/12?

yes, I'll reorder my patches to reflect this.

-- 
Han-Wen Nienhuys - Google Munich
I work 80%. Don't expect answers from me on Fridays.
--

Google Germany GmbH, Erika-Mann-Strasse 33, 80636 Munich

Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg

Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux