Re: [PATCH] rebase --autosquash: fix a potential segfault

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/05/2020 15:27, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi Andrei,
>
> On Wed, 6 May 2020, Andrei Rybak wrote:
>
>> On 2020-05-04 22:40, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget wrote:
>>> However, as reported by Paul Ganssle, that need not be true: the special
>>> form `fixup! <commit-hash>` is allowed to point to _another_ fixup
>>> commit in the middle of the fixup chain.
>>>
>>> Example:
>>>
>>> 	* 0192a To fixup
>>> 	* 02f12 fixup! To fixup
>>> 	* 03763 fixup! To fixup
>>> 	* 04ecb fixup! 02f12
>> Could you please clarify if I'm understanding this correctly: does this
>> affect the fixups-of-a-fixup which were created by
>>
>> 	git commit --fixup=<pointer to previous fixup! commit>
>>
>> ? For example:
>>
>> 	* 0192a To fixup
>> 	* 02f12 fixup! To fixup
>> 	* 03763 fixup! To fixup
>> 	* 04ecb fixup! fixup! To fixup
>>
>> Where 04ecb was created by pointing option --fixup at 02f12.
> No, it only affects commits whose oneline (i.e. the first line of the
> commit message) is `fixup! <commit-hash>`.
>
> Ciao,
> Johannes
Is this ability to have a commit message `fixup! <commit-hash>` documented?

I've looked a few times in the past and didn't find it. The docs for
`git commit --fixup=` doesn't put the oid in the commit's subject line,
rather it puts the subject of the referent commit after the "fixup! ".

Searching from a different direction I've just seen it is mentioned in
the v1.7.4 release notes.

Would a doc fix to clarify this be appropriate or have I missed something?

Philip




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux