Re: [PATCH] t/t0000-basic: make sure subtests also use TEST_SHELL_PATH

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 06:07:46PM -0700, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón wrote:

> 3f824e91c8 (t/Makefile: introduce TEST_SHELL_PATH, 2017-12-08) allows for
> setting a shell for running the tests, but the generated subtests weren't
> updated.

Yeah, this makes sense. The primary benefit of $TEST_SHELL_PATH was to
get better support for special testing options (like using bash's
trace_fd with "-x"). But based on recent patches I guess you were
wanting to test the behavior of an unusual shell. And if we're testing
how the test framework runs, certainly using TEST_SHELL_PATH is the most
sensible thing.

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux