On 8/2/07, Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Branches with names like "unlabeled-1.1.1" come from CVS branches for > which the revisions are still contained in the RCS files but for which > the branch name has been deleted. These wreak havoc on cvs2svn's > attempt to find simple branch sources and cause a proliferation of > basically useless branches. The main problem is that cvs2svn does not > attempt to figure out that "unlabeled-1.2.4" in one file might be the > same as "unlabeled-1.2.6" in another etc. I seem to recall discussing an algorithm to fix this on the cvs2svn mailing list. There was a somewhat simple way to correlate the "unlabeled-1.2.4" in one file might be the same as "unlabeled-1.2.6" problem. -- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
