On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 04:01:40PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Thanks for clarifying. I was a little confused when I read your patch > > series, since on first blush I thought that you were submitting it to be > > applied in Git's integration branches, and not Tig's. > > > > In either case, the heads-up is appreciated, but I do not think > > necessary in general. I am not sure about the feelings of others, but I > > do not think Tig-specific bugs need to be reported on Git's mailing > > list. > > > > Of course, if there are Git bugs that affect Tig (or any other project), > > we would be interested in hearing about them. > > > > That's all to say that I think the README there should be updated. > > FWIW, I do not mind seeing tig related improvements discussed here > (I am assuming tig does not have its own development list). That is > how we've been operating with other "projects around Git", like > "imerge" and "tbdiff" (no need to look for the latter these days, > though). Ah, fair enough: I do remember seeing an imerge query on the list a couple of days (weeks?) ago. > Unless Jonas and others who are involved find the list traffic here > is too heavy and messages about tig will be drowned in here, I do > not see a reason to kick them out. OK, that sounds good (it wasn't really up to me anyway, but I'm glad that I know how you feel about the matter ;)). Thanks, Taylor
