Re: Rename offensive terminology (master)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 4 May 2020, Simon Pieters wrote:

> "master" is an offensive term, as it can be interpreted as being
> slavery-origin terminology. See
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master/slave_(technology)#Terminology_concerns
>
> The Python programming language, and various other projects, have
> taken a stance and moved away from offensive terminology including
> "master". See https://bugs.python.org/issue34605

  uh ... i just popped over to that python.org discussion, and it does
not even *remotely* resemble what you describe. the gist of that
discussion is that most people seem opposed to a sweeping change, and
are annoyed about all the bandwidth that was wasted by one person
harping about this.

  based on what i read at that link, python has in no way "taken a
stance," so i'm calling you on your rather egregious misrepresentation
of what happened there.

rday



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux