On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 3:57 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > From: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > completion support for git switch is subpar for a number of cases. Most > > notable is difference between these two completions: > > > > $git switch <TAB> > > Display all 784 possibilities? (y or n) > > <list of all references and DWIM remotes> > > > > $git switch --track<TAB> > > jk-refactor-git-switch-completion master` > > ... > > We've discussed that it may be a good idea to make sure that "switch > -c", "checkout -b" and "switch/checkout --orphan" complete the new > branch name the same way, but haven't done anything else. I'd very > much appreciate to see the patches reviewed by those involved more > in the completion script, before we decide to merge the topic to > 'next'. It is my intention to extend this series with a notion of reading the previous word on the command line, and using that to determine if we are completing an argument for an option. Thanks, Jake
