Re: [PATCH 0/4] t: replace incorrect test_must_fail usage (part 5)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 08:22:22AM -0400, Denton Liu wrote:
> The overall scope of these patches is to replace inappropriate uses of
> test_must_fail. IOW, we should only allow test_must_fail to run on `git`
> and `test-tool`. Ultimately, we will conclude by making test_must_fail
> error out on non-git commands. An advance view of the final series can
> be found here[1].

This comment has nothing to do with your series, but I am curious if you
are planning on touching 'test_might_fail' at all. These can be useful
for non-Git commands, too, such as 'test_might_fail umask 022' on
systems that may or may not do something sensible with umask.

Sorry for injecting myself into this thread on an otherwise unrelated
topic.

Thanks,
Taylor



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux