Re: Git benchmark - comparison with Bazaar, Darcs, Git and Mercurial

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jakub Narebski wrote:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 
> > Perhaps if the destination is local,
> > 
> >          - if -s is given, just set up alternates, do nothing else;
> >          - by default, do "always copy never hardlink";
> >          - with -l, do "hardlink if possible";
> > 
> > Hmmmm...
> 
> That I think it is the best solution, together with support for
> file:///path/to/repo.git scheme which would turn on old repacking
> behavior. I'm all for it.

By the way, with "-l" you have hardlinks only till repack ("git gc"),
isn't it?

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux