I'm trying to help a user who has run into a situation where their repository has gotten so "big" (to some dimension of "big"ness) that they can no longer repack it on their hardware. Every time repack runs, it ends up consuming so much RAM the Linux OOM killer kills it before it can complete. The repack command being used is: git repack -Adln --unpack-unreachable=72.hours.ago A count-objects on the repository (without -h, so these sizes are in K) showed this: count: 346911 size: 18367032 in-pack: 45117481 packs: 27 size-pack: 9462621 prune-packable: 22584 garbage: 0 size-garbage: 0 After the next repack was killed by the OOM killer, the numbers changed to this: count: 427870 size: 22559712 in-pack: 90554922 packs: 37 size-pack: 18953693 prune-packable: 371285 garbage: 0 size-garbage: 0 The machine in question has 12 cores and 32GB of RAM. I've tried setting pack.threads=1, but still hit the OOM killer. Bumping the RAM for the machine to 64GB, paired with limiting repacking to a single thread, finally produced a successful repack. (But it appears to be unreliable, with some runs still failing. By the time the successful repack completed the git process was showing over 60GB of RAM in use--though that number is likely misleading.) There’s no setting applied for pack.windowMemory, but my local testing (on a different repository, I should note) didn’t show much change to repack’s overall memory usage even with that set. Repacking a 500MB repository with pack.windowMemory set to “100m” (and pack.threads set to 1) had still allocated far more than 100MB of RAM before the process completed. Unfortunately, I don't really know too much about the contents of the repository. I _do_ know that it contains binaries, some of which may be large, but that's all I can find out; the user is unable to share the actual repository with me. Does anyone have any suggestions on how I can constrain repack's memory usage, so this user can get a successful repack without requiring all the memory in the system to run (and bringing the system to a complete standstill for all other processing while it’s running)? Best regards, Bryan Turner
