Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Looks good to me; this is definitely necessary. For what it's worth, it > passes for me, but my system may not have as restrictive a umask as > others. Note that umask is not a system thing, but personal. When I was with smaller company, I used to have 002 as my umask, but these days I use 077. > I'd be happy to re-send this patch, but alternatively if you want to > just squash this in, I'd be just as happy. I'll keep it queued, until we need to replace it with an undated series. Thanks.
