Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> > + /* >> > + * NEEDSWORK: Doesn't look like there is a list of all possible hooks; >> > + * so below is a transcription of `git help hooks`. Later, this should >> > + * be replaced with some programmatically generated list (generated from >> > + * doc or else taken from some library which tells us about all the >> > + * hooks) >> > + */ >> >> Yes, I recall that we discussed adding some annotation to >> documentation and extracting this automatically. > > Right, we did. I think I was hesitant to move on it because I had > https://lore.kernel.org/git/20200420235310.94493-1-emilyshaffer@xxxxxxxxxx > on my back burner and wasn't sure how the hook architecture would look > afterwards. I thought we already agreed back then during that discussion I recalled that we'd leave that "single source of truth" unification out of the current topic. Unless anything has changed recently to bring us closer to be ready to start designing, I think it still is fine to keep the needs-work comment above and punting. Thanks.
