Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] date.c: skip fractional second part of ISO-8601

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Danh,
On 24/04/2020 01:07, Danh Doan wrote:
> On 2020-04-23 21:41:49+0100, Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email> wrote:
>> On 23/04/2020 20:28, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>> Danh Doan <congdanhqx@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> Would is_hhmmss() and is_yyyymmdd() be more obvious abbreviations for
>> most readers?
>>
>> Now that I type them, they do feel that bit too long... , as naming is
>> hard, maybe stick with the yms and hms, though I do keep wanting to type
>> ytd for the former..
> Not sure if I interpret your opinion correctly,
> Did you mean s/yms/ymd/ and s/ytd/ymd/?
Yes, and then no.
>
> Even that, I couldn't grasp the meaning of the last phase?
To explain the last part. I don't immediately recognise 'ymd' as a
typical abbreviation. A common three letter abbreviation, for me, would
be 'ytd' (year to date).

Taken together (my miss-spelling and alternate abbreviation), it
indicates that I was not tuned-in to the chosen abbreviations.
--
Philip





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux