Re: [PATCH 0/2] minor fixups for gs/commit-graph-path-filter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 06:14:36PM -0400, Garima Singh wrote:
>
> On 4/23/2020 4:58 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> > These are just a few bits I noticed in the test-tool helper when the
> > topic hit next (my -Wunused-parameter patch complained that we never
> > looked at argc).
> >
> >   [1/2]: test-bloom: fix some whitespace issues
> >   [2/2]: test-bloom: check that we have expected arguments
> >
> >  t/helper/test-bloom.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > -Peff
> >
>
> Thank you for doing this!
> Both patches look good to me.
> I also don't care about the brace/no-brace thing that
> Taylor brought up for 1/2.

To be clear, I don't care about them either ;). Maybe it's time that we
relax that rule (if it seems that a good number of us don't mind it
either way)..?

> Cheers!
> Garima Singh

Thanks,
Taylor



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux