Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > * With -l, as long as the source repository is healthy, it is > very likely that the recipient would be, too. Also it is > very cheap. You do not get any back-up benefit. Oh, but one does: an overzealous prune or rm -oopswrongoption in one repo does not hurt the other. > Which leads me to believe that being able to use file:/// is > probably a good idea, if only for testability, but probably of > little practical value, and we can default to -l for everyday > use, and paranoids can use non -l as a way to make a back-up. Sane enough, I guess. -- David Kastrup - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
