Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> But in v2:
>
> if (!haves_added || *in_vain >= MAX_IN_VAIN) {
>
> ("haves_added" is irrelevant to this discussion. It is another
> termination condition - when we have run out of "have"s to send.)
>
> So there is no check that "continue" was sent. We probably should change
> v2 to match v0.
That sounds like a good change.
Thanks.
