Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > The first two patches set this up, and the third patch uses it in > commit-graph.c, and corrects some test fallout. Eventually, we may want > to take another look at all of this and always create lockfiles with > permission 0444, but that change is much larger than this one and could > instead be done over time. So,... is the problem that this did not follow the common pattern of creating (while honoring umask) and then call adjust_shared_perm(), which I thought was the common pattern for files in $GIT_DIR/?
