Re: fixing ci failure of 'pu' with the es/bugreport topic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 08:45:05PM -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
> 
> Hi Emily,
> 
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 7:01 PM Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 6:28 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > >
> > > > Danh Doan <congdanhqx@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > > >
> > > >> Excerpt from build log:
> > > >>
> > > >>> fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'config-list.h'
> > > >>
> > > >> It's from bugreport topic.
> > > >> I've seen this failure in the past (when testing with pu),
> > > >> then I saw it disappear.
> > > >>
> > > >> I thought it was fixed during my testing for v4.
> > > >
> > > > Is the issue something similar to 976aaedc (msvc: add a Makefile
> > > > target to pre-generate the Visual Studio solution, 2019-07-29)?
> > > >
> > > > If that is the case, perhaps something like this would help?  I'll
> > > > tentatively queue it on top of es/bugreport and merge the result to
> > > > 'pu' to see what happens.
> > >
> > > The build just passed: https://github.com/git/git/runs/590781044
> > >
> > > Emily, you may need to squash in something along the line of this
> > > change to the commit in your series that starts building and using
> > > the config-list.h file (was it the first one?).  I've queued mine
> > > as a follow-up "oops, it was wrong" patch, but that would not be
> > > kosher from bisectability's point of view.
> >
> > Hm, ok. I'll send a reroll squashing this in verbatim tomorrow unless
> > I hear otherwise from Dscho? Looks like it's indeed the first one
> > (dd763e).
> > I'm curious to know how I can check this build method for myself for next time.
> 
> Create a fork of github.com/git/git and open a pull request against
> it.  (I believe you could also fork github.com/gitgitgadget/git and do
> a pull request against it, but I switched over to /git/git a while
> ago.) Immediately upon opening the pull request, a bunch of linux,
> mac, windows, and freebsd builds will be triggered with various runs
> of the testsuite.  Has been very useful for catching issues for me
> before I sent them off to the list.

I did before I sent this iteration, and it passed:
https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/573

That's why I'm confused :) Did I do something differently? I don't use
GGG to send the emails, but I do use it to run CI checks.

 - Emily



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux