On 2020-04-14 at 09:31:53, Đoàn Trần Công Danh wrote: > On 2020-04-14 00:03:24+0000, "brian m. carlson" <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > git-commit(1) claims we support ISO 8601 format. However, our > > approxidate code misparses some dates with fractional seconds. > > We have never fully supported ISO-8601, those representation are > perfectly valid ISO-8601 (for 2020-04-14) but it would require > more code to parse correctly, perhap "tm_wday" and "tm_yday", > and mktime may help. > > 2020-W16-2 > --04-14 > 2020-105 > > I don't think not many people interested in those formats. > If someone really need them, we can get back to them later. Yeah, I agree we don't need to support those. I would be happy if we said "RFC 3339", which is a more limited profile, and implemented that. The problem, as you alluded to (and I did as well in my original report), is that ISO 8601 provides a huge number of potential formats, most of which are not interesting for typical software. -- brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
