Re: has anyone bothered to read this "Git is a security risk"?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 04:13:39PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> 
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_blubracket_status_1250123442600513547&d=DwIBAg&c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&r=yZMPY-APGKyVIX7HgQFZJA&m=k4RlH5EiWlU380Hq8LD-BPM9q79__emrQNq4FBNAbh8&s=7_aq2xl8ld0WDJk4yd_gefOvg47E8MdlXvcj5aZwjug&e= 
> 

Yeah,

Not entirely fond of the phrasing to what reads to me like a
static-analysis tool (from what I can grok) whitepaper.

I don't think there's much that can be done in this regard though, no?

-Santiago


> rday

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux