Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> I agree that it would make for a much nicer read if the entire patch >> series was simply rebased on top of v2.26.0, with drops instead of >> reverts. I suspect that 4/6 will not even become a fixup, but that the >> resulting patch is really more of an `Initial-patch-by: Rohit` material >> with Phillip as the author on record. >> >> As to the changes, I had a brief look over them, and I have nothing to add >> to Elijah's review except to stress how excited I am about the increased >> test coverage. From my perspective, this makes the patch series 10x >> better. > > Thanks for all your feedback, I'll reroll as a new patch series based on > master Thanks, all.
