On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 2:29 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > So I am OK to rebase the other topic to v2.26.0; would that help? I > > already saw there was some entanglement with the other topic in one > > of the patches in this series, so... > > So I've done such a rebasing and queued the result to 'pu'. > jt/rebase-allow-duplicate used to be directly on v2.25.0 but now it > is on top of 'master'==9fadedd6, and these three patches are queued > directly on top of that. Hopefully I can push out the result of > today's integration with other topics in an hour or so. > > Thanks. Thanks, but wouldn't I want to base his patch on top of mine rather than vice versa? (Since mine might be labelled bugfix, and his is a new feature?)
