Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> In my latest attempt at documentation, I called these merges "diverters" >>> yet still used "--include-diversions". Here are a few other words that we >>> could use: >>> >>> * diverters or diversions >>> * redirects >>> * switches (think railroad switch). Synonym: exchange >>> * detours >> >> ...none of the above tells me that they are not no-op (in other >> words, they do something meaningful), so I must be coming from >> a direction different from you are. What redirects from what other >> thing, for example? > > The merges do something meaningful: they "merge in" a "real" change. Yes, but "redirect", "switch", "detour", or "divert" do not quite mean "merging in a real change", at least to me. > I'll just submit my v2 as-is, which includes a significant change to > the documentation that should make things more clear. Thanks.
