Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Saying "--no-rfc2047-encoding" would be more descriptive to _me_, but I > wonder if people not so familiar with the standards would find it a bit > obscure. Another option is to invert it to "--8bit-email-headers" or > something. Yup, having "rfc2047" in the name of the option was one of the things I considered suggesting, but I didn't for the same reason. I am OK with "--[no-]8bit-email-headers" (when --8bit, rfc2047 is skipped). Or "--[no-]email-header-encoding". Thanks.
