Re: Git benchmark - comparison with Bazaar, Darcs, Git and Mercurial

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> (Which admittedly is a bit odd. The reason I didn't ever seriously even 
>> consider monotone was that the initial import was so *incredibly* sucky, 
>> and took hours for the kernel. So use "-l" for benchmarks, and damn my 
>> "I hate hardlinking repos" idiocy).
>
> I would call aversion to -l a superstition, while aversion to -s
> has a sound technical reasons.  The latter means you need to know
> what you are doing --- namely, you are making the clone still
> dependent on the original.

Well, I'd not call the -l aversy a complete superstition: it means
that cloning a repository won't provide any redundancy worth noting
against file system corruption.

-- 
David Kastrup

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux