Re: [PATCH v4 07/23] sequencer: configurably warn on non-existent files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Denton

On 04/04/2020 02:11, Denton Liu wrote:
In the future, we plan on externing read_oneliner(). Future users of
read_oneliner() will want the ability to output warnings in the event
that the `path` doesn't exist. Introduce the
`READ_ONELINER_WARN_MISSING` flag which, if active, would issue a
warning when a file doesn't exist by skipping the `!file_exists()` check
and letting `strbuf_read_file()` handle that case.

Now that you've updated the function in a previous patch the file_exists() check referred to in the message no longer exists

Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  sequencer.c | 4 +++-
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
index 6c26d61670..b771e8f4ca 100644
--- a/sequencer.c
+++ b/sequencer.c
@@ -420,6 +420,7 @@ static int write_message(const void *buf, size_t len, const char *filename,
  }
#define READ_ONELINER_SKIP_IF_EMPTY (1 << 0)
+#define READ_ONELINER_WARN_MISSING (1 << 1)
/*
   * Resets a strbuf then reads a file that was presumably written by a shell
@@ -435,7 +436,8 @@ static int read_oneliner(struct strbuf *buf,
  {
  	strbuf_reset(buf);
  	if (strbuf_read_file(buf, path, 0) < 0) {
-		if (errno != ENOENT && errno != ENOTDIR)
+		if ((flags & READ_ONELINER_WARN_MISSING) ||
+				(errno != ENOENT && errno != ENOTDIR))

We don't need the extra indentation for '(errno != ...', it should align with the second '(' on the line above I think

Best Wishes

Phillip

  			warning_errno(_("could not read '%s'"), path);
  		return 0;
  	}




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux