> > + * If oid_nr is 0, this function returns 0 (success) immediately. > > Is this worth saying? If you ask to lazily grab 0 objects, it is > probably clear that no object would be read before the helper > returns. > > When oid_nr==0 you are allowed to pass oids==NULL, but otherwise, > oids==NULL would be an error. Is that the kind of difference you > wanted to point out, I wonder? Thanks for taking a look. Yes that was the difference I wanted to point out. After some thought, maybe I'll replace it with "oids points to an array of OIDs of size oid_nr. If oid_nr is 0, oids can be anything.".
