Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] New proc-receive hook for centralized workflow

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> From: Jiang Xin <zhiyou.jx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ## Changes since v5
>
> + Fixed code review issues on v5.
>
>   * s/cannot to/cannot/
>
>   * s/FLEX_ALLOC_MEM/FLEX_ALLOC_STR/

OK

>   * Add flag `C_LOCALE_OUTPUT` on test cases which may break
>     gettext-poison test.

We prefer to avoid the C_LOCALE_OUTPUT prerequiste when we can use
test_i18n<stuff> to make the poison test not care.  If it is too
hard to arrange in these tests, it is OK to omit, though.

>   * Note: `rp_errors()` in "receive-pack" is executed on the
>     server side, I think leave them unmarked for i18n is better.

Hmph, I vaguely recall saying something similar and then got a
disagreement from somebody.  Perhaps Jonathan (cc'ed)?

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux