Re: [PATCH 0/6] Doc: drop support for docbook-xsl before 1.74

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"brian m. carlson" <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I believe Emacs does have good integration with the info format.  I
> personally prefer documentation in almost any other format and would
> also be happy to see it go away, but Emacs users may find it convenient.
>
> Junio, I believe you use Emacs.  Do you have an opinion on whether, on
> the whole, Emacs users are likely to make good use of the info
> documentation?

I probably am very atypical; I used to read even system manuals via
info in Emacs, but for the last 10 years or more, I don't.  Another
reason that makes me a bad judge is because I do not use our doc in
any formatted form---"git grep -e ... Documentation/" is easier and
faster.  So, no, I have no opinion.

> If nobody seems to care very much for the info documentation, we could
> drop it.  I've put a query out on Twitter to see if anyone I know is
> using it.

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux