Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> + argv[0] = find_hook("proc-receive");
> + if (!argv[0]) {
> + rp_error("cannot to find hook 'proc-receive'");
Perhaps discard "to" from here. Also I notice that other messages
given to rp_error() are marked for _(i18n), but this one is not.
> + make_user_friendly_and_stable_output <out >actual &&
> + cat >expect <<-EOF &&
> + remote: # pre-receive hook
> + remote: pre-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/heads/next
> + remote: pre-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/for/master/topic
> + remote: error: cannot to find hook "proc-receive"
> + remote: # post-receive hook
> + remote: post-receive< <ZERO-OID> <COMMIT-A> refs/heads/next
> + To ../upstream
> + * [new branch] HEAD -> next
> + ! [remote rejected] HEAD -> refs/for/master/topic (fail to run proc-receive hook)
> + error: failed to push some refs to "../upstream"
> + EOF
> + test_cmp expect actual &&
This breaks gettext-poison test.
See https://travis-ci.org/github/git/git/jobs/669008025 for example.
