Re: [PATCH 4/9] update-ref: organize commands in an array

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrick Steinhardt <ps@xxxxxx> writes:

>> 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(command); i++) {
>> 		const char *eoc;
>> 		if (!skip_prefix(next, commands[i].prefix, &eoc) ||
>> 		    *eoc != ' ')
>> 			continue;
>> 		cmd = &command[i];
>>                 next = eoc;
>> 		break;
>> 	}
>
> The reason why I moved those `skip_prefix` calls into each of the
> respective commands is that this patch series introduces calls that do
> not accept a trailing space at all. Thus we cannot handle the space
> generically here, as that would was soon as we introduce the set of new
> commands.

That's not a good excuse, though, is it?  The command[] structure
can say "this takes parameters" or even "this takes N parameters",
and the field being zero (i.e. "does not take parameters" or "takes
zero parameters") would mean you do not want a trailing SP, no?

I also suspect that the "extra lines" thing we'd see in a later step
is correlated with this, but we'll see.

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux