> Sounds good. Jonathan? I've squashed Josh'es Reviewed-by, but I > will refrain from merging it to 'next' just yet to see if you too > like the proposed code structure. I think that this is a local enough concern that going either way won't paint us into a corner, so if what's in jt/connectivity-check-optim-in-partial-clone is OK, I prefer using that to reduce churn.
