Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] t7063: drop non-POSIX argument "-ls" from find(1)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Junio,

On Mon, 23 Mar 2020, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
>
> > diff --git a/t/t7063-status-untracked-cache.sh
> > b/t/t7063-status-untracked-cache.sh
> > index 190ae149cf3c..ab7e8b5fea01 100755
> > --- a/t/t7063-status-untracked-cache.sh
> > +++ b/t/t7063-status-untracked-cache.sh
> > @@ -18,7 +18,12 @@ GIT_FORCE_UNTRACKED_CACHE=true
> >  export GIT_FORCE_UNTRACKED_CACHE
> >
> >  sync_mtime () {
> > -       find . -type d -ls >/dev/null
> > +       if test_have_prereq BUSYBOX
> > +       then
> > +               find . -type d -print0 | xargs -0r ls -ld >/dev/null
> > +       else
> > +               find . -type d -ls >/dev/null
> > +       fi
>
> Given that this is only to work around the lazy mtime sync found on
> BSDs, if we were to have any if/then/else, shouldn't we be rather
> doing
>
> 	if test_have_prereq NEEDS_SYNC_MTIME_BECAUSE_WE_ARE_ON_BSD
> 	then
> 		find . -type d -ls >/dev/null
> 	fi
>
> to make it a no-op for most everybody (including Windows)?

I like that approach.

Thank you,
Dscho




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux