Re: Efficient way to import snapshots?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> 
>> I guess so, but can higher stage entries have cached stat
>> information that are valid and match the working tree?
>
> Probably unlikely, but I could imagine that it's the case for things that 
> failed to merge entirely (ie binaries), where you end up just saying "pick 
> the old/base binary", and it ends up matching in stage1.

Probably.  In any case, what I'll commit will have the stage#0
check, just to be safe anyway.

Thanks for the sanity.  Really appreciate it.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux