On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 03:50:55PM -0300, Matheus Tavares Bernardino wrote: > [1]: Someone that used '-rr 5 6' might have wanted the script to run > *both* tests 5 and 6. But I don't think we need to support that now, > since '-r 5 -r 6' doesn't do that as well (instead, the last value > overrides all previous ones). Well, that '-r 5 -r 6' should be written as '-r 5,6', but it shouldn't be terribly difficult to concatenate the args of multiple '-r' options with a comma, I suppose. But '-rr 5 6' just looks wrong.
