Re: Re: [GSoC][Patch]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Shourya,

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 9:26 PM Shourya Shukla
<shouryashukla.oo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hello Harshit,
>
> > The tests in t4131 leave a space character between the redirection operator
> > and the file i.e. the redirection target which does not conform to the
> > modern coding style.
>
> > Fix them.
>
> I think something like,
>
> The tests in t4131 were written a long time ago and hence contain style violations
> such as an extra space between the redirection operator(>) and the redirection target.
> Update it to match the latest CodingGuidelines.
>
> may be better.
>

Please see the comment made by Junio Hamano, pasted below:

"written a long time ago" does not have much value by itself (it
does serve as a backstory to explain a half of why it does not use
the more modern style, though).  "have a few style violations." is
almost meaningless (otherwise, you would not be doing a "modernize
style" patch in the first place ;-).

I myself also agree with the above comment and hence, wrote the commit message
accordingly. What do you think?

> Also, when you deliver a newer version of the patch, i.e., version 2 in your case,
> you have a [PATCH v2 1/n] as the subject, so that people know that it is the v2 and
> hence avoid confusion.
>
> If you are using 'git format-patch' to formulate your mails, you can do:
>
> 'git format-patch -v2 <..>' to get a v2 based mail.
>

Oh nice, didn't know about this. I will keep this in mind for future
patch submissions.
Should I do this for the current patch as well?

Regards,
Harshit Jain



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux