Re: [PATCH 3/3] configure: respect --without-openssl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020-03-18 11:22:13+0000, "brian m. carlson" <sandals@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2020-03-18 at 07:38:02, Đoàn Trần Công Danh wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  configure.ac | 12 +++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> > index 7468eb6bc8..20a11e1f32 100644
> > --- a/configure.ac
> > +++ b/configure.ac
> > @@ -544,9 +544,15 @@ GIT_STASH_FLAGS($OPENSSLDIR)
> >  
> >  AC_CHECK_LIB([crypto], [SHA1_Init],
> >  [NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=],
> > -[AC_CHECK_LIB([ssl], [SHA1_Init],
> > - [NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=YesPlease NO_OPENSSL=],
> > - [NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=          NO_OPENSSL=YesPlease])])
> > +[
> > +if "x$NO_OPENSSL" = xYesPlease; then
> > +	AC_MSG_ERROR([Disabled OpenSSL is required for SHA1])
> 
> I don't see this in the original.  Wouldn't we want to fall back to the
> default in this case, which would be SHA1DC?

This block of code will be run into in macOS only.

Really, I wasn't sure what should be done in this case (I mentioned in
the cover letter).

Should we set:

	NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=
	NO_OPENSSL=YesPlease

in this case instead?

-- 
Danh



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux