Jonathan Tan wrote: > Derrick Stolee wrote: >> but it appears that we rely on the "remote.<name>.promisor = true" >> setting instead of this extension. > > Hmm...besides giving the name of the promisor remote, the > extensions.partialClone setting is there to prevent old versions of Git > (that do not know this extension) from manipulating the repo. Yes, so the lack of setting is a bug. Christian, what would your prefered way be to fix this? Should extensions.partialclone specify a particular "default" promisor remote, or should we use a new repository extension for multiple promisors? [...] > I cloned and indeed it is as Stolee describes. Git still works as > expected if I remove "promisor = true" and add > "[extensions]\npartialclone=origin", so at least extensions.partialClone > is still supported, even if not written by default. Thanks for investigating. Sincerely, Jonathan
