On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 12:24:51PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > On the other hand, I am quite sure that while "git stash" did not > work, "git-stash" had no problem. Right. git-stash is in your PATH, but not in git's exec path (which is _not_ the same as PATH). > So something bogus in git's PATH lookup would definitely appear to be > going on: it should be hard to get the symlinks messed up badly enough > to have one work and not the other. Git doesn't look for subcommands in the PATH. -Peff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
