Hi, On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 8:46 PM Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > Thanks for your proposal! Thanks for your review! I have improved the proposal as suggested by you. Thus sending the v2 for the review. I know mentors may have limited time So I tried to keep my proposal short and DRY (Don’t Repeat Yourself) Changelog: + Timeline + Previous Work + Links after the text + Few minor changes + Fixed dead links - Links at the end of the doc Regards, Hariom ================================================= Link to docs: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15GPvle6S0iNg430aJx-gMrXvsgnzTlFNFhyP-K6Zmtw/edit?usp=sharing ================================================= **Unify ref-filter formats with other --pretty formats** Name : Hariom Verma Major : Computer Science and Engineering Mobile no. : [...] Email : [...] IRC : harry-hov (on #git-devel@freenode) Github : harry-hov Linkedin : https://www.linkedin.com/in/harry-hov/ Time Zone : IST (UTC +05:30) ## About me I am a Computer Science undergraduate at Shri G S Institute of Technology & Science, Indore, India. I am passionate about software freedom and open source communities. I've been writing in C, C++, Python & Dart for almost 3 years, and contributed to some projects which can be seen on [Github](https://github.com/harry-hov). I’m contributing to Git since Oct 2019 and would love to be a member of such a versatile community. ## Me & Git My contributions have helped me understand the review and patch submission process in a better way. Also, I now feel a bit more comfortable with Git’s codebase. ------------------------------ [PATCH] t2402: test worktree path when called in .git directory Status: Merged into master Mailing List: https://public-inbox.org/git/pull.570.git.1583305200143.gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx/ Github: https://github.com/git/git/commit/4d864895a23bbbb5403d9aa8a65d0576d2029597 ------------------------------ [PATCH v3 3/3] receive.denyCurrentBranch: respect all worktrees [PATCH v3 2/3] t5509: use a bare repository for test push target [PATCH v3 1/3] get_main_worktree(): allow it to be called in the Git directory Status: Merged into master Mailing List: [3/3]: https://public-inbox.org/git/d21a590d6c23f231c54b731b737c363b83660f79.1582484231.git.gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx/ [2/3]: https://public-inbox.org/git/ae749310f067c43429741987cd9f47c1ae4ceb3f.1582484231.git.gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx/ [1/3]: https://public-inbox.org/git/8718facbc951614f19407afa6ca8d6110507483d.1582484231.git.gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx/ Github: [3/3]: https://github.com/git/git/commit/4ef346482d6d5748861c1aa9d56712e847369b40 [2/3]: https://github.com/git/git/commit/f8692114dbb1b3ffe0b71871a015c632c195b784 [1/3]: https://github.com/git/git/commit/45f274fbb118cc4cb00640c30b4e3069d96755a0 ------------------------------ [PATCH 1/1] git-compat-util.h: drop the `PRIuMAX` and other fallback definitions Status: Merged into master Mailing List: https://public-inbox.org/git/177deddcf83c2550c0db536a7a6942ba69a92fa5.1574600963.git.gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx/ Github: https://github.com/git/git/commit/e547e5a89e3641bae02e762bcb0062951bb698e5 ------------------------------ [PATCH v2 1/1] builtin/blame.c: constants into bit shift format Status: Merged into master Mailing List: https://public-inbox.org/git/838478a185322572ed4747eb484b678a8e2d7ac6.1571334411.git.gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx/ Github: https://github.com/git/git/commit/86795774bb9ca3c63b94d3d0930405c1ba9148ec ## Proposed Project ### Abstract Git has an old problem of duplicated implementations of some logic. For example, Git had at least 4 different implementations to format command output for different commands. The foremost aim of this project is to simplify codebase by getting rid of duplication of a similar logic and, as a result, simplify adding new functionality. The current task is to reuse ref-filter formatting logic in pretty to minimize code duplication and to have one unified interface to extract all needed data from the object and to print it properly. ### Previous Work Olga<olyatelezhnaya@xxxxxxxxx> has done great work in “Unifying Git’s format languages” during Outreachy Round 15. Her work is mostly related to `cat-file` and `ref-filter`. She already did a pretty nice job in preparing ref-filter for more general usage of its formatting logic. It will give me the possibility to make a migration of pretty.c easier. ### Potential Problem The biggest challenge is to maintain backward compatibility while using reuse ref-filter formatting logic in pretty. One can't just delete some commands, rewrite them and change their interface. Also, bugs could get introduced while rewriting pretty.c. Getting rid of them is also an imperative task. So I may need to have a good knowledge of GDB. Nit: Almost a week before the end of the internship, Olga needed to redesign the solution(maybe to keep the logic same). I need to learn from her mistakes and will also need to keep that in mind while designing the solution for pretty.c ### The Plan My task is to change formatting logic in pretty.c. Actually, to remove the current formatting solution and reuse solution from ref-filter (maybe without changing pretty.c logically). As Thomas<t.gummerer@xxxxxxxxx> [suggested](https://public-inbox.org/git/20190331184930.GV32487@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/), I’ll start by first looking at what actually needed to be replaced (for example by studying the PRETTY FORMATS section in 'man git-log', what which verbs you can use in the ref-filter ('man git-for-each-ref') to achieve the same thing. Then I’ll research how one format is implemented in 'pretty.c', and see how a similar thing using the ref-filter is implemented in 'ref-filter.c'. e.g. the "%(objectname:short) %(contents:subject)" (this is missing coloring, but just to get you the idea) is similar to '--pretty=oneline'. Now one can try to find how 'oneline' is implemented in 'pretty.c', and could translate that to use the 'ref-filter' API. Possible Approach: I can just brute-force the process, merge pretty.h and ref-filter.h, and then step-by-step clean it up. Or I can create a blank file and put there needed functions step by step. Or I can just pick one format option at a time and convert it to use ref-filter logic. I am thinking about it, still don’t know what is better. Maybe later one? I guess we will sort this out ;) ## Estimated Timeline I have my end semester exams between 10 April - 30 April and also I have been shortlisted for Worlds Biggest Hackathon i.e Smart India Hackathon(SIH)(https://www.sih.gov.in/). I’ll be inactive from 1 April to 3 May for my exam preparation and Hackathon, which is way off the timeline. I believe I have enough fuel to get started on my goals - as a result to my involvement with the organization for almost 5 months now. --> Period - Inactive Period - April 1, 2020 - May 3, 2020 --> Tasks - Between 3-7 April - traveling and attending SIH Grand Finale - End-Semester will be near so I’ll be bit inactive, though always available on email or any other means of communication. --> Period - Community Bonding - April 27, 2020 - May 18, 2020 --> Tasks - understanding all the logic of pretty.* and ref-filter.* (what functions are used and how all formatting process is going) - Identifying the best candidates to be converted first. --> Period - My BirthDay - May 18, 2020 --> Tasks - Typical cake-cutting ceremony. --> Period - Coding phase 1 - May 18, 2020 - June 15, 2020 --> Tasks - Tweaking ref-filter(if necessary) lil bit. So its logic can be reused in pretty. - rewriting pretty.c skeleton, so that it could reuse formatting logic from ref-filter - Converting a couple of formatting options to reuse ref-filter formatting logic. --> Period - Coding phase 2 - June 19, 2020 - July 13, 2020 --> Tasks - Converting formatting options to reuse ref-filter formatting logic. - Teach new formatting options to --pretty using ref-filter --> Period - Final Coding Phase - July 17, 2020 - Aug 10, 2020 --> Tasks - Final touch-ups and bug fixes(if any) - Update Documentation *Debugging and improving the test coverage will always be the priority in every phase. *During April 27, 2020 - August 17, 2020, a blog series will be written on a weekly basis about my current findings and will also write about “What I’m working on” to further provide the status of my summer project. ## Availability My exams will end on 30 April. I might travel home after that. So, I can start actively writing code for this project after 3 May. My college resumes on 15 July. I can easily devote 45-50 hours a week until my college reopens and 35-40 hours per week after that. I'm also free on the weekends and I intend to complete most of the work before my college reopens. Other than this project, I have no commitments for this summer. I will also periodically post my status through blogs. ## Post GSoC As I said, I would love to be a member of Git’s community. So, I intend to keep contributing even after the GSoC period ends. Also, I just can’t ignore my love for Algorithms, so most probably after GSoC I would like to work on “Accelerate rename detection and range-diff”. ## Experience with Open Source (Optional) --> Organized many Git workshops for newcomers with HackSocIndore. - HackSocIndore is a group of developers that organizes Hackathons, Workshops & Technical Events. I’m the core team member at HackSoc. --> Mentor, Kharagpur Winter of Code (KWoC) - Kharagpur Winter of Code is a 5-week long online program for students who are new to Open Source Development. - KWoC 2019: https://kossiitkgp.org/public-files/KWoC/2019-Certificates/KWoC19-Hariom%20Verma.pdf - KWoC 2018: https://kossiitkgp.org/public-files/KWoC/2018-Certificates/KWoC18-Hariom%20Verma.pdf
